An article addressing technology law developments would need to include close to 200 issues, traps, and tips to approach a complete review. However, since few magazines would publish and fewer people would read such an article, I will settle for 23, beginning with year 2000 and Internet-related issues and moving on to CD-ROMs, association management systems, and more.
1. ISSUE: YEAR 2000
Some organizations assume that Y2K is either not a problem or, at least, not this year's problem. What's worse, some associations that recognize Y2K problems focus exclusively on internal systems and ignore external relationships.
Trap: Associations may face significant economic damage and legal problems by not addressing Y2K in time. Software involving dates, such as billing or renewal software, that is not programmed for the year 2000 may need substantial work. Hardware and embedded chips also need attention.
Tip: Give Y2K issues top priority. Some organizations that did not do so are already involved in court cases. There are currently more than two dozen year 2000 cases on the dockets, with more expected monthly.
Get a technology expert's written opinion and get legal advice to help determine if the association's software, hardware, and embedded chips are compliant. Do the same for critical external relationships. Some key Y2K legal issues include:
* Copyrights - Modifying a software program to make it year 2000 compliant may constitute copyright infringement.
* Contracts - A vendor's obligation to make its software year 2000 compliant may be determined by the terms of an existing contract; for example, the contract from when the software was first installed.
* Insurance - Costs to make software Y2K compliant may be covered by a current or prior-year insurance policy (this is unlikely but worth checking).
* Deadlines - Insurance notice and statute of limitation deadlines are passing by every day. These deadlines depend on things like when the organization knew or should have known about a year 2000 problem. In many cases, inattention and missed deadlines lead to waived legal rights. (Call (202) 626-2742 for a copy of related article, Year 2000 Action - Now, which appeared in the May/June 1998 issue of TechnoScope.)
2. ISSUE: E-MAIL
As a newspaper reporter once commented, many people communicate by e-mail as if they are talking with their best friends - and only their best friends - in a private dining room at home. But nothing is further from the truth.
Trap: E-mail - including so-called deleted e-mail - has become a huge source of "smoking gun" weaponry in litigation. Several employees and organizations have learned that e-mailed jokes or comments about the boss, the competition, or the organization's products or services are available to litigators.
Tip: Implement and enforce a business-only e-mail policy. Also impose an e-mail document retention and destruction policy that is confirmed by technology experts to irretrievably remove all e-mail messages from the association's system, servers, Internet service provider's servers, and all points in between. Have a lawyer review the policy before implementing it.
When using e-mail for board or committee work, for example, consider restricting messages to recording decisions and results of discussions rather than creating a verbatim transcript of all banter, preliminary ideas, off-the-cuff comments, and risky criticism.
3. ISSUE: THE WILD WEB
There are multiple ways to incur liability on the Internet. For example, the act of a partner in an association's partnership arrangements can lead to vicarious liability for the association. Also, problems at Web sites to which the organization provides hyperlinks may cause linking liability. This type of liability is also incurred when owners of hyperlinked sites claim that the linking is unauthorized. Additionally, there may be intellectual property liability - such as copyright and trademark infringement claims.
Trap: Organizations proceed with Web activities without regard and without taking steps to reduce potential liability.
Tip: Examine the association's plans and activities on the Web for liability. Find out what exposures the organization is insured for, and confirm your understanding by having your lawyer review your policy. Absent that confirmation of coverage for Web-related claims, assume the association is uninsured. Determine what legal steps the group can take to minimize liability exposure for activities for which it is uninsured. For instance, one way to minimize liability is to develop a Web site legal page. Make it comprehensive, user friendly, and up to date. Items to include are copyright and trademark notices and guidelines for online behavior such as uploading and downloading.
4. ISSUE: WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS
Many Web site development and operation problems are foreseeable. However, organizations sometimes develop sites without proper planning and contractual protection for these problems.
Trap: Developers offer to build or enhance Web sites for so little money (even for free) that Web site owners erroneously believe that low contract cost means a decreased need to thoroughly evaluate the contract. For example, one fund-raising organization planned to raise the majority of its $2 million annual budget through contributions from individuals visiting its new site. One vendor offered to develop the site for $500. Clearly, the value of the site was not $500. Yet based on that nominal contract cost, the board authorized equally nominal legal assistance with the contract.
Inattention to Web site development contracts could find the developer, not the association, owning the site. This means that the development company can resell or license the site or site software to others and can even close the site down with impunity.
Tip: Ignore the site-development cost specified in the contract when evaluating how much legal help to get and staff effort to devote to the Web site development or enhancement contract. Use an attorney with a good contract planning and drafting process to identify and deal with important economic issues such as ownership and control of the site and its content, server, and software.
Fosters Home For Imaginary Friends Part 1
There are drug tests carried out in almost all modern day sporting events. Although we tend to always hear the contrary through the media, it is in fact a common fact that the majority of competitors actually use performance enhancing drugs prior to or even right up to an event. There is nothing abnormal in wanting to get that competitive edge over your opponent and this normally tends to be anabolic steroids along with a concrete plan to "cheat the test"
Many competitions in powerlifting and bodybuilding are now drug tested at events. The idea is, of course, that everybody competes on a 'level field', aside from personal talent for sport. However, what frequently happens is that the guy who is on 'juice' and has found a way to get round the drug test comes out the winner. It isn't fair by any means, but that's life.
There are many sporting authorities that only know how it give negative press towards the use of performance enhancing drugs, but the matter of the fact is that it is the individual who has to make that decision. Everyone knows what will happen if you get caught taking them, but once again we are back to gaining the competitive edge. We often hear of athletes who haven't turned up for a drug tests, which can help an athlete avoid being sanctioned, but we are going to take a closer look at how the test can be beaten.
Types of Testing Procedure: During athletics meetings the more common body fluid that is tested for the presence of drugs is normally urine. We will be concentrating on dealing with the different procedures that are carried out to test this body fluid, although such procedures carried out to assess blood for the presence of illegal substances are practically the same.
There are a number of different laboratory testing processes used to test for performance enhancers, and it is important to know how these work, so that you can find a way to beat them!! By virtue of that statement, it goes without saying that you should find out what type of testing procedure your sample will be analysed by well in advance of the test so you can plan ahead...
Gas Chromatography(GC): This is a method that uses a separation technique to divide up a urine sample back into its component chemical parts. These substances are carried through chromatographic columns by a gas. chromatography is just a way of separating mixtures of compounds from each other, and leads to identification in the majority of cases. The chemical compounds in the urine can be identified by their 'retention time' on the chromatographic column - the retention time is unique for every individual drug, and therefore allows identification.
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry(GC/MS): This test uses a mix of gas chromatography, proceeded by mass spectrometry on the chemicals separated from the urine on the chromatographic column. The mass spectrometry permits the exact identification of any drugs found present in the urine by actually forming an exact 'molecular fingerprint' of the chemicals found present. That means in effect the chemical structure of the drugs that are present (the atoms present within the drug, and in the order they are actually bonded together) results by using this method. The problem is that this test is extremely expensive to use and only the richer sporting bodies would use it. The cost of the test is round about one hundred pounds per sample (around $200 US).
It goes without saying that we have just covered two pretty reasonably accurate tests, but you can always expect a certain degree of human error. One of the most common would be that of poor cleaning after testing, whereby contamination could lead to the next person to be tested to get an incorrect result. So bearing this in mind should you ever come out positive when you think you shouldn't have, well make sure you put in a protest.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC): This technique is extremely interesting as it tends to be used on test samples that are suspected of having anabolic steroids present. It's quite similar to GC, apart from that a liquid is used as a carrier for the sample through a chromatographic column, and not a gas. HPLC is both sensitive and a lot easier to carry out than GC. This test is often carried out on results that have already come from less sensitive ones.
Both Ajaay Kumar & Mick Hart are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Ajaay Kumar has sinced written about articles on various topics from Adsense, Home Improvement and Adsense. Did you find this article useful? For more useful tips & hints, Points to ponder and keep in mind, techniques & insights. Do please browse for more information at our website :-. Ajaay Kumar's top article generates over 74000 views. Bookmark Ajaay Kumar to your Favourites.
Mick Hart has sinced written about articles on various topics from Health, Recreation and Sports and Bodybuilding Supplements. Learn how to build some serious lean muscle... safely quickly and easily with bodybuilding and steroid expert Mick Hart's best seller Layman's G. Mick Hart's top article generates over 60500 views. Bookmark Mick Hart to your Favourites.
Backup Exec 12.5 Small Business Entrepreneurial educators need to bypass unreasonable trepidation and simply do what they do best, and it will pay off in the end