Most would-be candidates I speak to will spend 10% of their time looking for jobs, 10% preparing for the interview and 80% making their resume look perfect.
Worst still, once they've perfected the resume, they keep it static, regardless of the role they've applied for (but that's another story).
At the risk of sounding like I'm talking to a dog, I'll spell this out as simply as I can.
A resume won't get you a job.
Don't confuse yourself. Nobody got a job just by applying. Ok, I'll admit maybe one or two have, but for 99.999% of roles, it simply moved them one step along the process.
Recruitment is a numbers game.
Simply put, the more applications you make, the more interviews you will get. The more interviews you get, the more job offers you will receive.
You could strike it lucky and submit one application, get interviewed and offered the job. This is rare and not to be relied upon. The more applications you put out there, the better your chances of being interviewed.
It sounds so obvious, doesn't it? Yet most job seekers would rather rely on the immaculate resume that does all the work for them. One application, a killer resume and the job is theirs before they even turn up for the interview. Meeting the employer is just a formality.
Despite the numbers aspect, I would like to add that if you have a choice between 100 standard applications for jobs or 50 tailored applications, I would say your chances of getting an interview would be greater with the 50.
Me? I'd go for 100 tailored applications. Cover the numbers and the quality. Unfortunately, we live in an age where we want something for nothing. We all want to be millionaires and work only a few hours per week. In reality, fortune favours the hard worker.
So how would I recommend the division of labour? Well as the recruitment process is a funnel i.e. wider at the top than the bottom, you need to spend most time looking for jobs. You'll need to find more jobs to apply for than potential interviews. And in turn you'll need plenty of potential interviews to generate the job offers.
I wouldn't like to be prescriptive about percentages, but if you spent 50% of your time job-searching and then 30% of your time tailoring your resume, that would leave you 20% to spend preparing for interviews.
This is some way away from my prediction of a typical job seeker at the beginning. Yet the numbers make sense. Armed with this knowledge, the question is, what will you do with it?
My father used to laugh at my shyness with girls. He once told me that if I asked 100 girls out, at least a few were bound to say yes. A simple numbers game.
I agreed with his logic but, do you know what, I never followed his advice. The question is, will you be as stubborn as I was?
Don T Stop Believing New
Purdue Pharma, makers of the now infamous OxyContin, told the public in 2001 and for several subsequent years, that OxyContin had a lower risk of abuse and addiction than other prescription painkillers. The drug took the country by storm and, unfortunately, the users of the drug did the same with hospital ERs, drug detox and rehab centers, and morgues. Purdue lied, some people died, and many had their lives ruined. OxyContin addiction and abuse became almost epidemic and Purdue was fined $634.5 million earlier this year for their misdeeds. Now Alpharma is developing a synthetic morphine capsule they hope will fulfill the OxyContin promise. But how much of the abuse and addiction problem will it really resolve?
The story behind Purdue’s claim that OxyContin addiction and abuse was less likely than with other opiate painkillers was based on the drug’s time-release formulation. In fact, the FDA did allow Purdue Pharma to state that the time release of a narcotic like OxyContin “is believed to reduce" its potential to be abused. But Purdue sales reps, with the permission of Purdue, took it several steps further - they told doctors that “believed to reduce" is more than just theory and, according to federal officials, even drew their own fake scientific charts and distributed them to doctors to support the claim.
There were two basic problems with their claim: first, OxyContin addiction or, at the very least, dependency, is going to occur if you take it for even a relatively short period of time and even when taken as directed. The time release functionality has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Second, if you crush, dissolve or chew the pill, the time release functionality goes out the window and you get the full 12 hour dose in one hit. This point was considered to be the major departure from the truth in the Purdue hearings, and is the problem Alpharma is hoping to resolve with their new morphine pill. Here’s how it works - theoretically.
The new morphine pill is a capsule containing 100 to 200 tiny pellets. Each pellet contains a core of naltrexone - a drug that inhibits morphine-induced euphoria. If the capsule is taken intact, the naltrexone core remains inactive, but when crushed, chewed or dissolved the naltrexone integrates with the morphine.
The rationale behind this is that someone who is ‘using’ the drug as directed would take the capsule intact and get the pain relief they’re looking for, and someone wishing to ‘abuse’ the drug would crush, chew or dissolve it to get the morphine euphoria. However, if the naltrexone nullifies the euphoria, ‘abusers’ will not be interested in the drug.
And this, apparently, will reduce abuse and addiction.
How solid is this argument? Let me count the holes.
First, each individual metabolizes morphine and naltrexone differently, as directed by their DNA and a number of other complex factors. The amount of naltrexone in each pill may prove to be too little, or too much. Too little wouldn’t nullify the morphine euphoria, and too much could induce withdrawal. And you never really know how each person will respond.
Second, I can pretty much guarantee that anyone who’s at the point of chewing, crushing and dissolving any pill is already an addict. So, even though the person may be discouraged from using this particular morphine formulation, it’s not going to stop or prevent addiction or abuse.
Third, you don’t need to chew, crush or dissolve opiate painkillers to get addicted to them. And you don’t need to chew, crush or dissolve them to abuse them.
I don’t know how many of the 30,000 people who went to ERs, drug detox and rehab centers and morgues over the first few years after OxyContin’s release had chewed, crushed or dissolved the pills before taking them, but I do know there are plenty of people out there who wouldn’t even think of doing that who still developed an OxyContin addiction or dependency. I also know that taken as directed or not, time release or not, naltrexone core or not, people are going to get addicted to and dependent on this new drug.
Really, changing the way a pill is made will not change morphine addiction, Percocet addiction, OxyContin addiction or addiction to any other heavy opiate painkiller. They are highly addictive and they create physical dependency. Period.
What you can do is use these drugs only when absolutely necessary, take them only as directed, keep them out of everyone else’s reach even if you have to keep the bottle on your person at all times, and get off them as soon as possible. If you have trouble getting off them, find a good medical drug detox program that can help make it safe and as comfortable as possible. Whatever you do, don’t buy the hype.
Both Mark Walton & Gloria Mactaggart are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Mark Walton has sinced written about articles on various topics from Writing, Cover Letter and Writing. Mark Walton is the author of 21 Ways to Build the Perfect Resume, a self-help guide for people looking for a new job. If you want to improve your chances of getting a job offer then go to:. Mark Walton's top article generates over 165000 views. Bookmark Mark Walton to your Favourites.