Medical billing services have a number of basic steps they should incorporate into their billing process. These steps should include using a claims scrubber, use of no-response calls, posting zero pays, pursuing underpayments, and using likelihood of payment scores for patient collections.

Pursuing underpayments is the focus of today's article. This pursuit begins first and foremost with comparing the payment information from EOBs to the allowables outlined in the practice's payer contracts. This comparison must be done in an automated manner and cannot rely upon payment posters catching the underpayments on their own.

The need for automated comparison to allowables is not because of any short coming with the average payment poster, but because payers employ sophisticated techniques to make underpayments difficult to identify. Medical billing companies with well designed processes can counteract these techniques because they have much more scope than a single medical practice. By scope I mean that they see what payers do across multiple providers in multiple states. This broader view of the world allows a billing company that is leveraging its scope to uncover payer behaviors more easily than a single medical practice.

A disturbing pattern that can regularly be seen by a medical billing company that is paying attention is one where a payer will select a set of procedures and underpay this set of procedures across a large number of providers (often by the same amount). This will continue for about 30 days and then the payer will resume paying the procedures at the correct amount and begin underpaying a whole new selection of procedures.

Each individual underpayment is typically less than $20 and often less than $10. It is, however, death by a thousand cuts as these small losses can quickly reduce a medical practice's revenue by 5 to 10 percent. The tactics of constantly switching which CPTs are being underpaid and then underpaying in amounts that are small at the claim level make it hard for a practice to realize the magnitude of the money they are losing.

The pattern outlined above is why it is critical that a strategy for pursuing underpayments is not based upon payment posters picking up on the underpayments. Most payment posters will notice a large underpayment, but it is too much to expect them to spot a $5 underpayment.

This single action (comparison of payments to allowables) can increase a medical practice's collections by 5 to 10 percent. This is why you need to insure this critical step is being completed by your medical billing service.

Spotting the underpayment is only part of the battle, of course, the billing service also needs to have a systemic process in place for pursuing the underpayments. It is critical to pursue event the small underpayment amounts. Once a payer sees that their resources are being tied up readjudicating claims because of a $5.00 underpayment, the underpayments will often cease to happen.

Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II