Not long ago, I was riding my bike on a familiar trail near my home. I was deeply engrossed in possible topics for articles downloadable from our Natural Healing Tools web site.
The trail is about 20 miles long. Three to four miles of it run under large power lines towering over the path. Suddenly, it hit me - the topic of my next article. EMF! That buzzing sound overhead was coming from those power lines just above me. No, I couldn't see the field of energy emanating from the lines, but I sure could sense that I was passing through an area I wasn't comfortable with. Then, I remembered that I usually picked up my pace a little when I reached this stretch of trail, probably out of a sense of self-preservation.
Trying to not overreact, I remember thinking, "Hey, what you can't see won't hurt you...right?" I thought a little longer, then got the hell out'a there!
Over the last several years, I've speculated about the numbers of artificial energy sources - sources of EMF, or Electromagnetic Fields - that fill our environment. I, perhaps like you, question just how safe places like the path under the power lines are, despite overt signs of harm. Here's where I come down on the subject of EMF. Just my opinion, but based on a growing body of hard evidence and many hours of in-depth investigation.
A Little About EMF
As a kid, I remember learning that our Sun, Earth and other bodies naturally radiate electromagnetic energy of varying frequencies and intensities. Perhaps you've experienced the low electromagnetic frequencies generated by a lightning storm - you can feel the lightening.
Our sun is a natural source of EMF. We're told to use sunscreen to protect us from UV radiation. The Northern Lights are actually solar radiation colliding with the gases in the Earth's atmosphere. Without the protection of the atmosphere we would be bombarded with harmful, much more intense and potentially fatal radiation.
But these are natural sources of electromagnetic radiation and there's only so much we can do about them. What about the new forms of artificially generated radiation? Modern technology has introduced countless new sources of electromagnetic radiation.
Some estimates suggest that humankind today is subjected to 100 to 200 million times more electro-magnetic radiation than our distant ancestors. One hundred to 200 million times more! How can that possibly be good for us? The sources? Those power lines I mentioned earlier, but also computers, TV's, radio towers, cell phones and microwave ovens, to name just a few.
One recognized authority on the subject of EMF, Robert O. Becker, states in his book "Cross Currents" (pg.188), "We have now almost reached a state in which the entire electromagnetic spectrum has been filled up with man-made frequencies. Our electric-power systems oscillates (operates) at 50 or 60 times per second (50 - 60 Hz), just above the highest naturally occurring frequency of 30 Hz. Our microwave beams operate at billions of times per second and are getting even closer to the trillion-cycle frequencies of visible light. We have filled the previously empty electromagnetic spectrum between these two extremes with man-made radiation that never existed before on Earth. And we did it in less than eighty years."
Here's the problem.
We're the guinea pigs! In a sense, we have been silently recruited to participate in some ongoing experiment that will impact us long-term in ways we can only imagine. Only through the outspoken concern of people and groups has the issue of what many call "electropollution" been brought to the forefront.
According to Becker, there is a growing body of scientific evidence showing that exposure to man-made electromagnetic fields results in significant abnormalities in the physiology and function of living organisms. The potential risks to human health, he says, are well documented.
In his book "The Body Electric" (pg.327), Becker states, "Three dangers of EMF overshadow all others. The first has been conclusively proven: ELF, electromagnetic fields vibrating at about 30 to 100 hz, even if they are weaker than the earth's field, interfere with the cues that keep our biological cycles properly timed; chronic stress and impaired disease resistance result. Second, the available evidence strongly suggests that regulation of cellular growth processes is impaired by electropollution, increasing cancer rates and producing serious reproductive problems. Electromagnetic weapons constitute a third class of hazards culminating in climactic manipulation from a sorcerer's-apprentice level of ignorance."
So, what are the implications?
Let's look at what's known. All of those electrical devices with which we surround ourselves - office machines, computers and other devices that get plugged into a wall socket - all operate at a frequency of 60Hz. The huge power lines that cover over 500,000 miles across the United States operate at 60Hz. Studies show that these 60 Hz frequencies (ELF, extremely low frequency) have damaging effects on all life forms of life. These frequencies are suspected of contributing to or even causing depression, suicides, psychosis, cancer, leukemia and a number of other physical and mental problems. Scientific evidence also indicate these frequencies can influence our genetic material during cell division, possibly linking chronic exposure to the origins of cancer (Becker, above).
Then there are those devices that operate at the other end of the electromagnetic spectrum, like our cell phones. Cell phones use microwaves that oscillate at billions of times per second. What are the long-term effects of using devices that operate at billions of time per second? We simply don't know. This is an area that is much less understood.
What can we do to protect ourselves?
Here's what I do and don't do. Again, this is what I think and believe based on compelling scientific evidence and hundreds of hours of investigation. Follow your conscience.
&bullDon't position your electric clock radio in close proximity to your head.
&bullMinimize all electrical devices in your bedroom.
&bullIf you sleep with an electric blanket, turn it on before you get in bed and unplug it when you get in. Never keep it on while sleeping.
&bullAvoid waterbed heaters.
&bullSit at least arms length away from your computer.
&bullStay back from appliances when running - microwave, electric range, all of them.
&bullThe larger your TV screen the further back you should sit (a readily available hand held meter will test EMF and help you determine how far back you should be).
&bullStay at least ½ miles away from TV or radio towers.
&bullAvoid long conversations on cell phones and always wear an earpiece (above 2 minutes has shown alterations in electrical activity of the brain for at least 1 hr. after use.)
&bullDon't wear your cell phone on your belt or in a pocket while it is on (you are still absorbing radiation)
&bullUse a landline instead of your cell phone whenever possible.
&bullLimit your time spent under fluorescent lights (they produce much different magnetic fields compared with incandescent bulbs.
&bullBefore you buy a home have it tested for high levels of EMF.
&bullConsider proper grounding of household wiring.
&bullUse protective devices that have been tested in areas where there is increased EMF exposure (workplace, home, vehicle).
In the meantime .........
We're just now beginning to understand how electromagnetic fields affect living organisms. More hard knowledge and wider awareness are needed to help us make wise choices and ensure a safe future of the generations to come. We continue to see newer advances in technology that outpace the research being done to warn us of potential dangers. Most people continue to enjoy the comforts of these new technologies but never think about the consequences of using them.
The choice to use or not use these new devices and how often or long to use them is an individual one. I'm unwilling to let the never-ending new sources of EMF work their way into my home, my car, my clothing and my work area without questioning and limiting my exposure to them. For my money, no exposure and very limited exposure is the way to go. Until there are uniform guidelines based on hard scientific evidence about how much and how long are safe for each type of device, I choose to do without or do with less.
It's time we stop letting ourselves be guinea pigs. It's time we start insisting that those elected or appointed to protect us do their job. It's time to find out what is and isn't happening to us after hours, days, weeks, months and years of exposure.
Electromagnetic Fields And Energy
In the winter of 1990, teachers at the Slater Elementary School in Fresno, California, began to worry about the high rate of cancer among the staff. First-grade teacher Patricia Berryman recalls, "We originally started to worry when we began to realize that an abnormal amount of cancer cases had been on one side of the school.
Then we saw the EPA report on electromagnetic fields and cancer and we realized that that was the side of the campus near the high-voltage lines. We had some leukemia and brain cancer, just like in the studies. We also had some children with leukemia. Well, we started to research everything we could find." Berryman herself was particularly concerned because, "I've spent sixteen years teaching near those power lines."
The teachers began to gather information about cancer cases within the school. "We couldn't trace the whole student body, but we were able to trace the teachers. We went back through all the old yearbooks, made lists of everyone who taught here since the school opened in 1972. We had previous teachers call up and tell us of more cases. Then we made a map and presented it to the parents, to show them where the teachers had been working. Well, their mouths hung open."
Berryman and her group discovered nine cases of cancer in a group of fifty-seven teachers, aides, and lunchroom staff who had worked in two pods (A and B) on the southwest side of the school. That side of the building lies only 110 feet away from a set of two high-voltage power lines-one a 230-kilovolt (kv) line, the other a 115-kv line. One teacher who had worked on that side of the campus for fifteen years had died of brain cancer in 1990, another of melanoma. They also found four cases of children with cancer, but, since the state didn't keep any records of the disease in that area until 1987, it's been difficult to trace the children. There were no cases of cancer in teachers who worked in the two pods on the other side of the campus, further from the lines.
According to the California Department of Health Services, the "conditions" among the school staff that have been diagnosed between 1982 and 1991 include nine invasive cancers (two cases of breast cancer, two cases of uterine cancer, two cases of ovarian cancer, one brain cancer, and two melanomas); one case of skin cancer; one nonmalignant brain tumor; two cases of cervical dysplasia; two cases of pre-cancer of the uterus; three cases of benign breast tumors or cysts; one case of keratosis; one case of sarcoidosis, and a number of basal cell carcinomas. Among the students who attended those pods, the state found three cancer cases and four possible cancer cases, as well as two nonmalignant tumors and one cervical dysplasia.
Besides worrying about cancer, some of the teachers were also concerned that the electromagnetic fields had bad effects on the children's learning and behavior. "For years, we had noticed the behavior of the children in those classrooms. They couldn't pay attention, they fidgeted, they just couldn't keep their feet on the floor. We kept a journal while we were still there and knew we were going to be moving to the trailers. In those days, we really thought first graders simply could not sit still. It all changed when we moved away from those lines."
When word of the problem started to get around in the spring of 1991, many teachers refused to work in the classrooms near the power lines. Fourteen teachers requested transfers to other schools. There was even talk of a teachers' strike. But, still, nobody seemed to be listening to the teachers-until the parents became involved. Patricia Berryman explains, "1 remember a parent came up to me one day and asked, What can we do to help? The parents picketed and invited all the news media to attend. After that we got immediate action. "
More than a hundred parents and children picketed Slater in May 1991. They carried placards that read "SAVE THE CHILDREN" and "PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES MAKE COMMON SENSE." The demonstration kicked off a school wide boycott that had been organized by parents like Lynn Stetson, who is currently the president of the PTA and one of the co-chair people of an ongoing EMF task force at Slater. The parents demanded that classrooms and a portion of the playground near the power lines be closed.
The Fresno Unified School District responded to their demands immediately by closing the ten classrooms, placing the children in ten portable trailers on the other side of the campus at a monthly cost of $695 per trailer, and closing off an area of the playground that was nearest the power lines.
A May 17 memo to the superintendent from Fresno Unified School District Chief Financial Officer Cathi Vogel recommended the changes, stating, "Although evidence is inconclusive regarding the potential hazards of power lines, the concerns of Slater staff, students, and parents are impacting the instructional program and must be addressed immediately."
Donald Beauregard, Fresno area administrator for the FUSD, said, "We told everyone it was a temporary thing. We had to do something. We had teachers who were refusing to teach in those classrooms. This was about human health, teachers, and kids. There was a tremendous amount of fear and, as you realize, fear can interfere a lot with the overall educational process. Something that bothers me is, right now, we still have schools around the county that are being built right near transmission lines."
Beauregard serves on the EMF subcommittee with Berryman, teacher Sandra Craft, and Lynn Stetson. The committee meets regularly to grapple with the overall issue of whether or not there is a danger from the power lines and, if so, what to do about it. Stetson refers to the committee as "our little group," adding that she always feels they are the "underdogs" at public meetings.
Berryman concurs. "It's terrible. There are only three of us and Mr. Beauregard. On the other side of the table PG&E [Pacific Gas and Electric] has all these engineers who keep telling us there's nothing to worry about from the power lines. Then the state health department keeps telling us there's no funds to do a study of our school.
The state brought in epidemiologists from the county health department. The first was a or Stall worth and he just got up and told us we were all wrong; there was nothing to it. Well, after that one meeting, we never saw him again. They told us his report got lost in the computer. Now we have a woman named Betty Carmona. She tells us she doesn't know much more about this than we do ourselves, but she seems sympathetic."
Or. Raymond P. Neutra, chief of the epidemiological studies section of the California Department of Health Services, hedges a lot when he discusses this and other EMF public health scenarios around the state. Despite the fact that or Neutra is directly involved in two major California studies of childhood cancer and EMF exposure, and is privy to all the latest information on the subject, he argues that studies haven't really proven there is any connection between electromagnetic fields and cancer.
He also disputes whether or not there really was a high incidence of cancer at Slater, saying that nine cases were a "little higher than the expected four cases" for the entire teaching staff, although the incidences had only occurred among the fifty-seven teachers who had worked in two pods of the building. He also said his cancer surveillance unit was determining whether those teachers really worked in the classrooms they said they did and that his department didn't have the funds to do a study of the children to track cancer cases.
Both Dr. James P. Urban & Paul Fitzgerald are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Dr. James P. Urban has sinced written about articles on various topics from Wellness, Guided Meditation and Supplements. Dr. James P. Urban is president of Natural Healing Tools and author of many articles concerning natural health practices. Looking for a little p. Dr. James P. Urban's top article generates over 480 views. Bookmark Dr. James P. Urban to your Favourites.
Paul Fitzgerald has sinced written about articles on various topics from Marketing Tool, Massage and Environment. Educational Cell Phone Digital Book by Paul Fitzgerald, EMF expert, graduated from NJIT in Newark, NJ. He has been studying EMF's for over 15 y. Paul Fitzgerald's top article generates over 5000000 views. Bookmark Paul Fitzgerald to your Favourites.
Corolle Potty Training Doll I highly recommend Emma or Paul as a potty training doll for your child. If you are looking for ideas and options for your training, this might be the answer