For example, some players don't like raising small pocket pairs from early position (like Daut) full ring. But when you're playing 6 Max you can profitably raise any PP from any position.



So what are the main differences between 6 max and full ring from a strategic standpoint?

* In 6 max you can play your pocket pairs like AK from any position. Even when your c bet doesn't take down the pot your hand has more value than full ring.

* Your made hands are much stronger in 6 max games. You still have to worry about pot control but you have more room for value betting as a rule.

* Many pots will end up heads-up and you generally see more hands 6 handed. This allows the best players to press their edge more often.

* You can profitably squeeze from the blinds because late position openers have wider ranges. Aggression is the key to success in this game in most cases.

Can't make up your mind on your favorite kind of game? Here is a test for you. Count up how many times you replied yes to the following questions.

* Do you enjoy maximizing you long term win rate at the expense of variance ? By this we mean although you will win more money in the long term your swings will be much larger?

* Do you like playing a lot of pots? Do you prefer creating a loose aggressive image at the table to get paid on your strong hands?

* Do you take poker seriously and put in the hours ? Your hourly will be greater 6 handed because you will see more hands. This is especially true if you multi-table.

* Do you take the time to study your opponents and make your plays based on specific reads. 6 max will give the opportunity to develop great reads.

The bottom line is that the best game really comes down to your affinities and skill set. It also depends on your aversion to risk.